title: "ECS-研究成果-阅读笔记3"
矿物转换过程中的共线性问题
Mineralogy Logs: Element To Mineral Transforms And Compositional Colinearity In Sediments.
- Publisher:Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts
- Language:English
- Document ID:1992-M
- Content Type:Conference Paper
- Authors:P. K. Harvey, J C Lofts, M. A. Lovell, University of Leicester
- Source:SPWLA 33rd Annual Logging Symposium, 1992
- Copyright:1992. Society of Petrophysicists & Well Log Analysts
- Abstract:
The inversion of chemical data to meaningful mineralogical assemblages provides a quantitative basis for the prediction of petrophysical parameters. The most valuable transforms attempt to provide the proportions of actual mineral phases present (solids and fluids) at each depth interval rather than ideal minerals occurring in theoretical models (norms). Compositional colinearity, in which three or more of these phases lie on, or close to, the same compositional plane is a most serious problem. Depending on the algorithm used for the inversion the effects of these compositional constraints may vary between a failure to find any numerical solution, failure to find a unique solution, or a solution which may be significantly in error. These effects are illustrated for sedimentary environments using well-constrained laboratory geochemical and mineralogy data.
硅质岩中用三元图来表达成分，可以简单的认为是 (Si02-Al203-K20-H20)模型，组成矿物包括： quartz, muscovite, illite, k-feldspar and kaolinite等等。。。
三元图
由于硅质岩的复杂性，导致有很多种可能性。。。这就是共线性问题：
- k-feldspar + kaolinite = illite
- k-feldspar + kaolinite = muscovite + quartz
- quartz + muscovite + kaolinite = illite
- quartz + muscovite = k-feldspar + illite
那么，如何解决？采用以下流程：
貌似总体思想是这样的，用了很多实验和数据来说明，老实说，这篇文章看得似懂非懂。。。。